H.R. 1742: Access to Reproductive Care for Servicemembers Act
This bill, titled the Access to Reproductive Care for Servicemembers Act
, aims to improve access to reproductive health care for members of the Armed Forces, particularly regarding abortion and fertility care. Here are the key points:
Objective
The main goal of the bill is to establish policies that allow military personnel and their dependents to take leave for reproductive health care needs, including abortion and assisted reproductive technology, without facing obstacles or penalties from their superiors.
Key Findings
- Many states have imposed bans on abortion access following recent Supreme Court decisions, creating barriers for military families seeking care.
- Access to reproductive care is critical for the health and well-being of military members, and delays can lead to significant personal, financial, and social consequences.
- Members of the Armed Forces are often stationed in areas with restricted access to abortion services, complicating their ability to seek care.
- Some military policies may restrict a member's ability to take leave for these procedures based on the discretion of unit commanders.
Provisions for Leave
- The bill requires that military members be granted leave for non-covered reproductive health care, classifying it as time-sensitive, thereby making it easier for them to secure necessary services.
- Members taking leave for reproductive health care won't have to disclose the specific reasons to their commanding officers.
- Provisions are included for the reimbursement of travel-related expenses incurred while seeking non-covered reproductive health services, including:
- Meals and lodging.
- Transportation to and from the care location.
- Travel costs for any necessary escorts or attendants.
Privacy and Non-Retaliation
- Health care providers and commanding officers are mandated to protect the privacy of military members when they take leave for these health care services.
- No member shall face adverse actions for requesting, taking, or approving leave for reproductive health care as outlined in the bill.
Definitions
The term non-covered reproductive health care
includes:
- Abortion care not covered under existing military healthcare provisions.
- Assisted reproductive technologies such as:
- Ovarian stimulation and egg retrieval.
- Sperm collection and processing.
- Intrauterine insemination.
- In vitro fertilization and various transfer techniques.
Impact on Military Personnel
The bill recognizes that the restrictions on reproductive health care access disproportionately affect specific groups within the military, including junior enlisted members and various minority communities. The inability to access these services may impact the Armed Forces' capacity to recruit and retain personnel, thus affecting military readiness.
Relevant Companies
None found.
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
78 bill sponsors
-
TrackMikie Sherrill
Sponsor
-
TrackYassamin Ansari
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJake Auchincloss
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackWesley Bell
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJulia Brownley
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackNikki Budzinski
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSalud O. Carbajal
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndré Carson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTroy A. Carter
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackKathy Castor
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSheila Cherfilus-McCormick
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJudy Chu
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackYvette D. Clarke
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGerald E. Connolly
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJoe Courtney
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJasmine Crockett
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJason Crow
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDanny K. Davis
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDiana DeGette
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackChristopher R. Deluzio
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMaxine Dexter
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDebbie Dingell
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSarah Elfreth
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackVeronica Escobar
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLois Frankel
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLaura Friedman
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSylvia R. Garcia
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRobert Garcia
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJosh Gottheimer
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRaúl M. Grijalva
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJahana Hayes
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSteven Horsford
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackChrissy Houlahan
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJonathan L. Jackson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSara Jacobs
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJulie Johnson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackHenry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr.
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSydney Kamlager-Dove
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRo Khanna
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJohn B. Larson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSarah McBride
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackApril McClain Delaney
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJennifer L. McClellan
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBetty McCollum
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMorgan McGarvey
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJames P. McGovern
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGwen Moore
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSeth Moulton
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackKevin Mullin
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJerrold Nadler
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDonald Norcross
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEleanor Holmes Norton
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJimmy Panetta
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackScott H. Peters
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBrittany Pettersen
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMike Quigley
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackPatrick Ryan
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndrea Salinas
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMary Gay Scanlon
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBradley Scott Schneider
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackKim Schrier
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTerri A. Sewell
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEric Sorensen
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDarren Soto
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGreg Stanton
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMarilyn Strickland
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEric Swalwell
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBennie G. Thompson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDina Titus
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJill N. Tokuda
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLori Trahan
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDerek Tran
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLauren Underwood
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackNydia M. Velázquez
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDebbie Wasserman Schultz
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGeorge Whitesides
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackFrederica S. Wilson
Co-Sponsor
Actions
3 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Feb. 11, 2026 | ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Houlahan asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 1742, a bill originally introduced by Representative Sherrill, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection. |
| Feb. 27, 2025 | Introduced in House |
| Feb. 27, 2025 | Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
Potentially Relevant Congressional Stock Trades
No relevant congressional stock trades found.